The documentary Inside
Job gave us a glimpse of corruption within our financial sector. Now to understand why this happened and what
we need to do to prevent it from happening again we need to look at the history
of regulation. We see regulations on
business and industry becoming popular during the Progressive Era. The most notable being the anti-trust laws,
designed to destroy and prohibit monopolies, and the institution of a progressive
federal income tax, designed to protect the American consumer.
During the second half of the twentieth century we see
deregulation start to take place. Caps
on interest rates on savings and checking accounts were removed. Banks found they had the money to push for
change that benefited them, it even extended to the point that they could
directly violate the law and face no repercussions. We see this in 1998 when
Citicorp and Travelers merged. In
Charles Ferguson’s Inside Job Robert
Gnaizda remarked, “It was illegal
to acquire Travelers. Greenspan said nothing. The Federal Reserve gave 'em an
exemption for a year; and then they got the law passed.” Glass vs Steagall restrictions were removed, bank lobbying
increased exponentially, and any attempts to propose any new regulation were
opposed vehemently and the existing ones begin to be attacked.
The
hard thing about proposing reforms is that there is money against it. We would need a completely impartial team of economic
specialists, foreign and domestic, to sit down with lawmakers and work out a
plan. I personally think the
concentration of wealth within a few key banks is a weakness. We may have to find a way to break some of
these key players up. I think we also
need to impose regulations on investment banks to prevent them from making
risky decisions with investor money. The
financial sector needs controlled growth, not an explosion of growth.
BTW, http://www.openthegovernment.org/sites/default/files/otg/dereg-timeline-2009-07.pdf
is a very helpful link to help understand financial deregulation.
Very interesting comparison.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the hard thing proposing reforms is the money behind it, as well as the wealth in a few key banks are a weakness. great essay Dan.
ReplyDelete